← Back to Autonomy

Diagnostics · The Series · Reading Map

The Diagnosis Series

Nine connected pieces, from one car’s messy evidence to a fleet-wide campaign — and back around to preventing the fault entirely. A map, and where to start.

What this is

One long argument told in ten parts. It begins with a single vehicle and a pile of untrustworthy clues, builds a disciplined method for turning evidence into a cause, asks when you actually know enough to stop, handles the cases that break the easy assumptions, scales the whole thing to a fleet of thousands, makes the fleet methods statistically honest, proves cause with real experiments, pushes detection down onto the vehicle, lays the data foundation underneath it all, and finally closes the loop by engineering the fault out so it never returns, and finally wiring the whole method into a scalable, multi-agent software product. Read it in order, or jump to the part you need.

§ — The Arc

The whole series, on one map

Three movements — the core method, then fleet scale, then proof, foundations, and prevention — with the loop closing back to the start.

Figure — How the ten parts connect
I · THE CORE METHOD 1 · Uncertain, mixed evidence 2 · Is the evidence enough? 3 · Harder cases II · AT FLEET SCALE 4 · Fleet-scale RCA 5 · Fleet, made rigorous III · PROOF · FOUNDATIONS · PREVENTION 6 · Proving cause (experiments) 7 · Diagnosis on the vehicle 8 · The data plumbing 9 · Prevention & the loop 10 · From method to product prevention closes the loop ↺ — the best fault is one that can’t recur
One method, three movements. The core (1–3) is the reasoning discipline on a single vehicle; fleet scale (4–5) lifts it to a population; the last group (6–9) proves cause with experiments, pushes detection onto the car, lays the data foundation, and closes the loop with prevention — then part 10 wires the whole method into scalable software.
§ — The Ten Parts

Read in order, or jump in

I · The core method

1

Root-Cause Analysis Under Uncertain, Heterogeneous Evidence

Grade, anchor, and fuse messy, unequal-trust clues into one defensible cause — with a worked battery case and downloadable mockup inputs.

2

When Is the Evidence Enough?

The sufficiency gate, value of information, the sequential stopping test, and what to do when trusted sources disagree.

3

Harder Cases in Diagnosis

When the comfortable assumptions break: multiple simultaneous faults, intermittent events, and sensors that lie.

II · At fleet scale

4

Fleet-Scale Root-Cause Analysis

One code across a population: de-mix the mixture, let the cohort boundary name the cause, and turn it into a remediation scope.

5

Fleet RCA, Made Rigorous

The numbers under the figures: significance, multiple-comparisons, CUSUM surveillance, Weibull forecasting, verify-the-fix, and phantom patterns.

III · Proof, foundations & prevention

6

Proving Cause with Experiments

From observation to proof: DAGs, the staged rollout as a randomized experiment, difference-in-differences, and instrumental variables.

7

Diagnosis on the Vehicle

Real-time detection at the edge — observers, residuals, false-alarm budgets, certification — feeding the offline fleet pipeline.

8

The Data Plumbing Behind Fleet Diagnosis

The unglamorous foundation: joining records by VIN, aligning clocks, surviving missing data, and the pipeline that assembles the table.

9

From Root Cause to No Cause

Closing the loop: CAPA/8D, FMEA feedback, control plans, poka-yoke, and the escape points — so the fault is engineered out for good.

IV · Build the system

10

From Method to Product

The architecture of an AI-powered, multi-agent fleet-diagnosis tool — data, detection, agents, tools, memory, and the human in the loop — built to be practical, scalable, and a product.

Where to start

New to the topic? Read 1 → 2 → 3 for the reasoning discipline, then 4 → 5 for fleets. Already do this work and want the sharp edges? Jump to 5 (rigor), 6 (proof), or 9 (prevention). Building the system rather than doing the analysis? Start with 8 (data) and 7 (edge), then 10 (the whole architecture).